Jersey's Top Lawman Denies "Culture of Corruption"

********* TOP STORY *********


Matt Rooney | August 24, 2010


Advertise with Save Jersey!

Follow Save Jersey on Twitter

Connect with Save Jersey



Need a Dynamic Online Presence?




Save Jersey Presents "The Governor" Saga

http://images.quickblogcast.com/8/2/6/3/1/121715-113628/the_governor_godfather_(2).jpg

Save Jersey's ObamaCare Archives

Reagan Slams ObamaCare

Say NO to Corzine in 2009

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3013/2554820836_8c5be6a10f.jpg

Join the Movement


http://www.blogtalkradio.com/pics/hostpics/41216a4a-0cdc-4a0c-93cc-fdae908c2b57SaveJersey.com%20Logo.jpg

Tips?

http://www.coloradodar.org/chapters/zebulonpike/pike.gif

Breaking story?
Political gossip?
Inside Info?

We want it all, Save Jersey!
Send Zebulon your tips.
Confidentiality is guaranteed.

Click Here to Share a Tip!

Save Jersey Widget

Recent Comments

  1. fico score on Rush Limbaugh: "I Love Chris Christie"
    9/2/2010
  2. skin cancer screening Sydney on PROOF: ObamaCare is about CONTROL, Not Health!
    9/2/2010
  3. fico score on Save Jersey Video: "A Loan She Can't Refuse"
    9/2/2010
  4. mnorth on Denial Ain't Just a River in Egypt
    9/2/2010
  5. pa personal injury attorney on Lawyers Own Democrats
    9/2/2010
  6. Long Island Swimming Pools on Shock Video: Obama Vows to Disarm America
    9/1/2010
  7. sadasd on One Year Ago Today...
    9/1/2010
  8. sadasda on One Year Ago Today...
    9/1/2010
  9. DECKERSophie33 on VIDEO: Governor Christie Calls Liberal Reporter Moran "Thin-Skinned"
    9/1/2010
  10. Zachary Y. Cooper on Sabato Sums Up Corzine: "Mishaps, Girlfriend Problems and Tax Increases"
    9/1/2010

Spread the Word

"Towards a Free and Prosperous NJ"

© 2009 Save Jersey

The Save Jersey Blog: Search Results for "obamacare"

Articles Matching Your Search

An Epic ObamaCare #FAIL in New Jersey

  | August 25, 2010


During the prolonged ObamaCare debate, many of the plan's critics (including your Blogger-in-Chief) questioned the rush to pass a healthcare package. Was there really a large and urgent demand for government-subsidized health insurance? Or were Democrat leaders' motivations to move things along more political than humanitarian? After all, it's well-established that Obama's "47 million uninsured Americans" line is rubbish. Only the marketplace can efficiently account for demand; government involvement is always based on guesswork. No Democrat could've rightly claimed to know how many Americans would even want an ObamaCare package!

Now I think we may have our answer, Save Jerseyans.

In New Jersey, for example, only two people out of nearly nine million Garden State residents have bothered to sign up!

MyFox 5 NY

"Just two people in New Jersey will begin receiving coverage Monday under new plans created by federal health care reforms.

NJ Protect plans are available to those who have been without insurance for at least six months and submit evidence of pre-existing health conditions.

The state will receive $141 million in federal subsidies to cover claims that exceed the premiums paid by the beneficiaries."


This epic ObamaCare #fail is bad news for the legislation's backers. 

A low level of participation is good news, however, for the two individuals who actually got off their butts and enrolled. They get to split $141 million worth of coverage right down the middle!

That's change John Doe #1 & #2 can believe in. The rest of us will pay for it even though we have no desire to use it!


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Here's Why the Star-Ledger is Going Under

  | August 23, 2010


It's the end of August, Save Jerseyans. Summer is winding down. Working class taxpayers are cashing in their banked vacation days, legislatures are in recess to allow members to campaign throughout their home districts, and news capable of moving papers isn't very easy to come by. I get it! The old media has to be creative to survive. Since they stopped reporting the facts decades ago, the search for lame "human interest" substitutes is forever ongoing. However, trying to pass this latest Star-Ledger travesty off as "news" marks an incredible new low for the Garden State's largest (and most endangered) daily rag.

For yesterday's story, Ledger reporters visited Chris Christie's childhood teachers and relayed some of their "disappointment" with the Governor's aggressive state employee reforms and ongoing public relations war with the notorious New Jersey Education Association (NJEA). And the story's objective title? "Gov. Christie's attitude toward N.J. education bewilders, hurts his former teachers."





THAT qualifies as news? Really???

Why doesn't the Ledger's staff drop in on President Obama's pediatrician (assuming he's practicing in America and not at a foreign madrasah) and inquire whether he backs ObamaCare? Or hunt down Joe Biden's Sunday School teacher and see whether he/she approves of his law school plagiarism? Does Carla Katz's family approve of how she financed her cars, home and kids' trust funds? Better yet, why don't we locate Tom Moran's boyhood babysitter and ask whether he was really "thin-skinned" from birth? 

The Ledger could also do some REAL work and round up several NJEA teachers to ascertain whether they understand how much of their union dues are wasted on nasty, factually-incorrect and ineffective (if you believe the latest polls) anti-Christie media campaigns. Any takers on the odds of that story seeing the light of day, Save Jerseyans?

Yup: New Jersey's mainstream media is in sad, sad shape. The Christie-teacher story is yet another truly stupid, lazy attempt to circumvent the norms of journalistic integrity to sell papers, folks, and, in my humble opinion, is definitely beneath a newspaper of the Ledger's (former) stature. It's hardly surprising that the paper's circulation continues to plummet; after all, they've clearly forgotten who used to buy their papers...

...the taxpayers whom Governor Christie's busting his hump for on a daily basis! That's why, my dense liberal friends, his approval ratings are on a completely opposite trajectory than the Ledger's profit projections.


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

What's Wrong with White Women?

  | August 17, 2010


Harold Suthers wants to know, Save Jerseyans!

Hat tip to my main man Art Gallagher, Dean of the New Jersey Conservative Blogging Caucus and Central Jersey's most influential media personality, who did a little "man on the street" interviewing at Democrat Rep. Frank Pallone's Long Branch open house yesterday afternoon. One of Art's interviewees happened to be Harold, a male African American (presumably a resident of CD-6, although the fact wasn't clear) who really didn't understand why so many white women showed up at Pallone's office to protest ObamaCare.

The video:





I don't even know where to begin with this one, folks. There's so much that your Blogger-in-Chief could say about Howard's seemingly genuine confusion regarding what he witnessed outside Pallone's office and, furthermore, what Howard's reaction tells us about our culture, values, and politics in modern America. It'd take several posts and no one really wants to read that much! Too damn hot out...

Can any white, female Save Jerseyans out there in this audience help Howard and articulate your opposition to ObamaCare? I know Anna Little could offer a satisfactory, thorough explanation if Howard would be willing to keep an open mind.



 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Chris Christie Isn't Your Savior (and Doesn't Want to Be)

  | August 17, 2010


It's spelled "CHRISTIE, C-h-r-i-s-t-i-e," Save Jerseyans. Note the "i" and "e" located at the end of our Governor's surname. Some of my fellow conservative commentators seem to occasionally forget that crucially important fact and, quite frankly, I couldn't live like they do: thoroughly and completely emotionally affected by every public policy triumph (or perceived ideological betrayal) effectuated by the new Governor of New Jersey.

The latest example? Governor Christie told reporters yesterday that politicians were "overreacting" to the Ground Zero mosque controversy. The Governor usually prefers to avoid getting drawn into controversies that don't directly impact the scope of his current position, but these particular comments prompted some of the usual characters (and a few people I genuinely respect like "The Great One" Mark Levin - see the video posted below) to accuse Christie of political cowardice. 

Newsflash, folks: Chris Christie isn't the second coming of Christ and (for the record) he never once claimed to be! He's a good family man, a great governor, a talented communicator and, without a doubt, an extremely promising future leader for a country that's gone far, far astray from the constitutional model established by our American framers. He's even arguably running a more conservative administration than Reagan during the Gipper's California gubernatorial tenure. I've said it a million times, but who could've imagined that a New Jersey governor would reform the pension system, take on the unions, stand up to the education bureaucracy, cap property tax increases, balance the state budget without tax hikes, and still manage to affect a modest decrease in the size and scope of state government... all in the first six months of his term in office?

However, with all of that being said, you're going to be a little disappointed going forward, folks, if you expect my friend Chris Christie to be "right" -- in either sense of the word -- on every single issue. I've yet to see/read about/experience the elected chief executive who measured up to such an unrealistically high standard. I happen to strongly oppose the mosque and wish the Governor did, too, just like I wish he'd join the ObamaCare lawsuit, support drilling off the Jersey coast and recognize the folly of "green technology." But he is what he is, and what he is happens to be pretty damn good by the standards of any objective taxpaying American.

And did anyone even bother to ask Chris Christie whether he wanted to be our conservative savior? I don't know him as well as some (but better than most), and your Blogger-in-Chief doesn't think the Guv's very interested in a national job, let alone the presidency. This guy is 110% dedicated to saving Jersey. Would he consider running for president in 2016? Of course! But Chris Christie LOVES his home state as I do, and he's not going to focus on his next potential job until he's satisfied with what he's accomplished as governor of New Jersey. Frankly, it's kind of nice to have a Garden State party leader who isn't running for president 24/7.

My two cents? As conservatives, we need to get over our need for a leader. In recent years, there's always this big damn rush to anoint someone Reagan's successor, and then without fail, said individual either 1) disappoints for some personal/stylistic reason (Sanford, Palin, Jindal etc.) or they 2) reveal some kind of real or imagined political flaw (Gingrich partnering with former Senator Clinton to champion certain legislation). It's a vicious, counter-productive cycle, my friends, and if conservatives keep it up, we're guaranteed to never find Mr. or Mrs. Right.




 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

VIDEO: Christie Defends Record (But Not Snooki) on "This Week"

 
| July 25, 2010


Governor Christie made his Sunday morning show debut today on ABC's "This Week" program.

Chief White House Correspondent Jake Tapper questioned the Guv on this year's budget battle, his unique "tone," immigration reform, the ObamaCare lawsuit, his relations with teachers, the "Republican brand," and a number of other hot topics in an interview that lasted less than 10-minutes. I thought he handled himself pretty well overall (he usually does), but Tapper certainly didn't pull any punches. It was a serious discussion, Save Jerseyans...

...except for that Snooki question. Patrick Murray also got a shout-out during the interview when Governor Christie took issue with the Monmouth pollster's budget analysis. Any press is good press! Ask Tom Moran.

Enjoy:




 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

2010: Year of the Mama Grizzly?

Bill Hughes | July 20, 2010



Hello Save Jerseyans!  What an honor to join such an impressive conservative site!

I recently wrote over on Examiner.com about New Jersey’s very own “Mama Grizzly” in the sixth legislative district, Anna Little.  Little, a common sense conservative from the Tea Party set, won an upset victory in the June primary to claim the nomination in the fall race against 11 term incumbent Frank Pallone, Jr.  Little is our very own representation of what seems to be a national trend this election year as a new wave of conservative women rises up to take back our country.

A year ago, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin held a press conference to announce that she wasn’t seeking re-election and therefore resign her office 2 1/2 years into her 4 year term in order to avoid being a lame duck.  She claimed at the time that this was the best decision for her family, her state and the state of conservative politics.  She also claimed that she as not retreating but reloading.

At the time, the hostile media circulated rumors of scandal.  The Palins were getting divorced.  There was a federal indictment looming.  A year later and those rumors proved to be yet another in a long ling of malicious, dare I say sexist, attacks on a confident conservative woman that they deemed as a threat to their political power.

Now, I may differ with some of the good folks here at Save Jersey as to her political viability in 2012 (I think she has a very good chance indeed) but I think that folks from across the conservative spectrum can see that Palin’s contribution to this election has already been quite significant.  Before Palin’s arrival on the national scene, most female politicians on the GOP side were, at best, squishy moderates, and in many cases, outright leftist loons.  Her whirlwind candidacy in the 2008 election gave a face to the new conservative woman and inspired many to get involved in politics for the first time.

Palin’s resignation from office freed her schedule to become the conservative kingmaker that she is today.  She has traveled the country in the last year on behalf of good common sense conservative candidates, many of whom were serious underdogs in their primaries.

Many of those she has championed are what she has called “Mama Grizzlies.”  These pink elephants are women who have entered politics because they are frightened with the radical socialist agenda of the Obama administration and the left-wing pin-up girl and Botox enthusiast Nancy Pelosi. 

Largely due to her influence and support, these women are prepared to take the political world by storm this November.

One such “Mama Grizzly” is South Carolina’s Nikki Haley.  Haley, at the time of Palin’s endorsement, was in fourth place in the primary contest.  In the week after the Palin endorsement Haley launched into a sizable first place lead.  Haley has since gone on to claim the nomination and leads her Democratic opponent in public polling.  Haley challenged the establishment Republicans with a no-nonsense common sense conservative approach and won.  She looks like a winning bet in South Carolina and is poised to be the first woman and Indian-American to win statewide office in the state.  

Another “Mama Grizzly” worth noting is Georgia’s Karen Handel, who also leapt to a lead in her primary contest after Palin’s endorsement.  Handel is currently serving as the Georgia Secretary of State and brings a tough conservative sensibility with her as she campaigns for Georgia's top job.  

Mama Grizzly candidates are also running for governor in Oklahoma where Mary Fallin is running for the state’s top job, New Mexico, where Susana Martinez is running for governor, and Arizona, where tough as nails current governor Jan Brewer (the female Chris Christie) is running for a full term in her own right.  For the Republican party, the amount of strong female candidates running for statewide office is a great sign of the depth and strength of the party’s pool of candidates.

The party also has a plethora of good conservative women running for congress in the form of the aforementioned Anna Little in New Jersey, Michelle Bachmann in Minnesota,  and Star Parker in California.  

The great thing about the diversity of the GOP candidates this year is that they are right on the issues.  RINOs are going down to defeat everywhere around this country as common sense conservatives are rising up to put a stop the menacing liberal overlords of both political parties that have been running this nation into the ground.

In the age of Obama, RINOs are no longer enough.  We need tough and confident conservative men and women to aggressively take on the radical socialist agenda Obama has begun to put into place.  It won't be enough to be the slightly less liberal party this time around.  In the words of former President Reagan, this is a time for bold colors not pale pastels.  The American people are hungry for an alternative to Obama-tinged socialism.  They need to be presented with a bold common sense conservative agenda to vote for.  If the GOP can do this, they are going to do very well this November.

There are many trends this election, but there is no denying the conservative uprising that is so evident in many of these races.  In raising support for candidates across the country and advancing the cause of conservatism, Mrs. Palin has done well in her new role.  2010 is shaping up to be the year of the Mama Grizzly indeed!

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Weinberg, Campaigning for Planned Parenthood Funds, Remains Cognizant of ObamaCare "Loophole" Funding Pennsylvania Abortions

 
| July 15, 2010


State Senator Loretta Weinberg (D-Teaneck) and her ghoulish gal pals are watching developments in Pennsylvania very, very closely, Save Jerseyans. They'd absolutely love to replicate the scam Keystone State Democrats have going on over there, and they're hoping that New Jersey taxpayers don't figure out their strategy until it's already too late.

On our side of the river, Republican Governor Christie took a stand and cut public abortion funds from the state budget. Pennsylvania's Democrat governor, Ed "Fast Eddie" Rendell, harbors radically different ideas f
rom his PA counterpart regarding human dignity, abortion, and the government's role in healthcare generally. Very different. So much so, that we've learned from the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) how Rendell's government is now teaming up with the Obama Administration to funnel federal dollars to Keystone State abortion doctors.

You can click here to read NRLC's full release. What they've learned is that ObamaCare's 2,700 pages obscured a massive loophole through which the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) can subsidize certain health insurance plans covering abortion procedures:

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) has emphasized that the high-risk pool program is a federal program and that the states will not incur any cost. On May 11, 2010, in a letter to Democratic and Republican congressional leaders on implementation of the new law, DHHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius wrote that "states may choose whether and how they participate in the program, which is funded entirely by the federal government."

Details of the high-risk pool plans for most states are not yet available. But on June 28, Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner Joel Ario (a member of the appointed cabinet of Governor Edward Rendell, a Democrat) issued a press release announcing that the federal Department of Health and Human Services had approved his agency's proposal for implementing the new program in Pennsylvania. "The state will receive $160 million to set up the program, which will provide coverage to as many as 5,600 people between now and 2014," according to the release. "The plan's benefit package will include preventive care, physician services, diagnostic testing, hospitalization, mental health services, prescription medications and much more, with subsidized premiums of $283 a month."

Doesn't seem so bad thus far? Well, as they say, the devil's in the details.

Keep reading:

Examination of the detailed Pennsylvania plan, reveals that the "much more" will include insurance coverage of any legal abortion.

The section on abortion (see page 14) asserts that "elective abortions are not covered." However, that statement proves to be a red herring, because the operative language does not define "elective." Rather, the proposal specifies that the coverage "includes only abortions and contraceptives that satisfy the requirements of" several specific statutes, the most pertinent of which is 18 Pa. C.S. § 3204, which says that an abortion is legal in Pennsylvania (consistent with Roe v. Wade) if a single physician believes that it is "necessary" based on "all factors (physical, emotional, psychological, familial and the woman's age) relevant to the well-being of the woman." Indeed, the cited statute provides only a single circumstance in which an abortion prior to 24 weeks is NOT permitted under the Pennsylvania statute: "No abortion which is sought solely because of the sex of the unborn child shall be deemed a necessary abortion."

As a result, "Under the Rendell-Sebelius plan, federal funds will subsidize coverage of abortion performed for any reason, except sex selection," said NRLC's Johnson. "The Pennsylvania proposal conspicuously lacks language that would prevent funding of abortions performed as a method of birth control or for any other reason, except sex selection -- and the Obama Administration has now approved this."

Hence, this federally-funded "high-risk pool" program renders Barack Obama's March executive order completely utterly meaningless. It was all a sham just like we suspected. ObamaCare WILL, in fact, use federal tax dollars to terminate young lives despite the President's express promise that it wouldn't.

The Washington Times editorial board seized on Obama's double-cross yesterday, articulating how this insidious ObamaCare scheme subverts both state and federal laws: 

What's worse is that this high-risk insurance program evades laws that ordinarily would govern the use of both federal and Pennsylvania tax money. It skirts the executive order because the order applies only to new insurance "exchanges" and "community health programs," not these purportedly high risk insurance programs. It also avoids state law 3215(c), which forbids state government funds from being used for abortions except in cases of rape, incest or threats to the mother's life. Because this state program is to be run entirely with federal funds, not state funds, 3215(c) doesn't apply. How clever.


"Clever" indeed. I hope the exceedingly "clever" Bart Stupak, who single-handedly allowed this ObamaCare travesty to see the light of day, finds plenty of time to contemplate each and every grisly byproduct of the legislation he rescued during his upcoming retirement.

I'd also like to say that I'm surprised by the Obama-Rendell charade, folks, but more Americans every day come to appreciate how this President can't be trusted to tell us the truth. Barack Obama's first loyalty is to a radical agenda that's far to the left of this country's mainstream voter. He sees himself at the helm of a fundamentally flawed country. He's committed to "changing" it, and he will stop at nothing to accomplish said "change," including lie to members of Congress, the media, and American taxpayers.

Loretta Weinberg, Linda Greenstein, Linda Stender and the rest of Jersey's Dem caucus share the morally lax "change at any cost" attitude exhibited by their party's leader. They've argued in recent days that restored New Jersey public aid to Planned Parenthood couldn't fund abortions because it's "prohibited" by law. How disingenuous! As best as I can tell, Barack Obama and Ed Rendell just figured out how to circumvent Supreme Court-sanctioned state restrictions on abortion even where they're in place. There's also not an "abortion fund lockbox" in the back rooms of these clinics, folks. If public money goes to an organization that performs millions of annual abortions, then the tax dollars appropriated for that purpose are entering into the organization's general revenue stream. If the taxpayers' $7.5 million pays the electric bill or contributes to an abortion doc's 401(k), then the public is directly subsidizing abortion. To claim otherwise is to insult our intelligence!

Our friend Marie Tasy nailed it in her recent guest post, Save Jerseyans: the New Jersey Democrat campaign to restore public money for Planned Parenthood has nothing to do with healthcare! This is a coordinated effort to pay for abortions with your money and it cannot be allowed to succeed. 



 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Two Rothman Town Hall Meetings Slated for Monday

 
| July 11, 2010


Rep. Steve Rothman (D-NJ) is hosting two town hall meeting this upcoming Monday, July 12th in his NJ-9 district, Save Jerseyans.

If you live in Hudson, Passaic, or Bergen counties, head'on over and be heard.

Details:



Townhall #1:

10:30 AM to 12:00 PM
Lodi Senior Center
15 Walnut Street, Lodi NJ 07644

Townhall #2:

7:00 PM to 8:30 PM
Englewood Municipal Court
73 South Van Brunt Street
Englewood NJ 07631


I definitely recommend checking the Congressman's website before heading over, folks, just in case there's any last minute changes to the details. Sometimes these Democrat Congressmen throw 11th hour curveballs to deliberately suppress attendance. It's happened...

For those of you who don't know and would like to, Steve Rothman is a terrible liberal. He held a round of town hall meetings back in August 2009 and insisted that ObamaCare wouldn't have the effect of "socializing" or "nationalizing" healthcare. I've always found that to be a curious position, don't you agree? Any industry for which the government can control prices with mandates, regulations, and even a government-run alternative is, by definition, "nationalized." To claim otherwise is pure sophistry or, in the common tongue, "bullshit."

So enjoy the town halls if you choose to attend, Save Jerseyans, and please (respectfully) give'em hell for your Blogger-in-Chief?



 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

CD-3 Debate Recap: Runyan Holds His Own?

 | July 7, 2010

UPDATE:
 The Runyan camp has posted audio files of the debate. Click here to listen.
__

I really think so, Save Jerseyans.

The CD-3 combatants met for the first time today on Philadelphia's 1210AM for a rush hour radio debate. 
The former Eagles star was confident, articulate, and on offense throughout the entire debate.
Your Blogger-in-Chief was particularly impressed by how the political novice Runyan pressed the veteran politico Adler on the timing of his decision to vote "no" on ObamaCare

Does Runyan's delivery have room to improve? Absolutely. But as I said yesterday, all political debates are expectations games. Congressman Adler anticipated an easy win and so did many of the talking heads. Since Adler clearly didn't get an easy 'W' today (Runyan really held his own), in the interest of "grading" today's debate with some degree of accuracy, any objective observer has to award Round One to the challenger.

Some audio and analysis from Fox 29:





Did you listen in this morning, Save Jerseyans?

Let me know how you think it shook out...



 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Paul Mulshine Rages Against Irrelevancy

 | July 6, 2010

I'm not entirely sure why Star-Ledger columnist Paul Moonshine Mulshine hates Save Jersey so much, folks. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that a simple Google search for "Paul Mulshine" immediately yields the following Save Jersey-produced picture:



Oops...

But that's just it, Save Jerseyans. Mulshine and his rapidly shrinking pool of allies aren't the least bit pleased by this blog's success. Much like how Steve Lonegan is incensed that the man he labeled a "RINO" last year is now widely discussed as the conservative choice for the Republican Presidential nomination in 2012.

Three points for your consideration offered in response to Paul Mulshine's rant aimed at Save Jersey:

1. Mulshine's Poorly-Written Column is Completely (and Conveniently) Out-of-Context

Paul didn't even try to discuss this story on its merits, folks. Why would he? The facts don't support his real goal:discrediting this blog and its bloggers.

On Thursday, Save Jersey's J. Rivera (formerly known as "Dino Crocetti) threw up a well-written but provocative post rebutting AFP's budget criticism and accusing Steve Lonegan of being "blind to the truth" re: the Governor's record. We regularly illustrate the absurd with a healthy dose of absurdity here at the blog. Example? Recently, I wondered aloud whether U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg would have survived his bout with cancer under ObamaCare (which he supports). National Review called it a "fair but morbid question." Most readers appreciated the point. Some liberal readers said I was a monster for even asking the question. The important point? We took advantage of a very serious situation to conduct an equally important debate.

No sane, honest person would've accused me of wishing the Senator ill. Likewise, especially with further explanation from Rivera, it's pretty clear that he didn't intend to trivialize Steve Lonegan's legal blindness. To the contrary, Justin was simply illustrating (as only he can) the hypocrisy of Lonegan and his groupies, who'd frankly much rather see Governor Christie humbled than pitch in and help achieve real progress for this state's taxpayers. Read it for yourselves and make your own determination. I made mine -- to let the original post go back up -- after J. Rivera communicated to me what he was trying to accomplish. Our readers are among the most intelligent participants in the blogosphere; they're fully capable of differentiating between hard-hitting commentary and actual malice.

2. Mulshine is Tom Moran's Token Self-Loathing Conservative.

Do you really think the "thin-skinned" Tom Moran, liberal opinion editor of Mulshine's Star-Ledger, keeps him around because Moran actually respects the conservative perspective? Hardly! Mulshine is useful because he's a self-described "conservative" who spends all of his time attacking other conservatives and the Republican Party. This little trick has been getting Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan booked on cable news shows for years. Mulshine isn't as talented; a semi-regular column in a state-based daily will have to do!

But hey... everyone has to make a living, right? With newspapers folding across the county and the Star-Ledger's circulation plummeting, Mulshine has to do what he can to stay off unemployment. I get it! Just don't expect me to let him get away with lecturing us on conservatism.

3. Mulshine is Raging Against Irrelevancy.

Chris Christie's emergence as a national conservative icon rendered Steve Lonegan almost instantly irrelevant, Save Jerseyans. Think about everything Chris Christie has accomplished in his first six months. Other than getting arrested in Middle Township, I can't pinpoint a single tangible example where Steve Lonegan successfully advanced the conservative cause in New Jersey. Consequently, his deranged flock of followers won't rest until they tear this Governor down and reclaim Steve's traditional role as the State's top right-winger. 

Furthermore, as Chris Christie's most vocal and prominent supporter online, your Blogger-in-Chief wakes up every day expecting to draw some of the fire from this Governor's enemies. So be it. "Saving Jersey" from radical liberals, corrupt politicians, and egomaniacs from both sides of the ideological divide was never going to be a cakewalk. I'm up to the challenge. I know this Governor is!

So go ahead and throw your little hissy fit, Paul. Whatever makes you feel better! The Christie-led taxpayer revolution is moving forward with or without you. Get on board or get out of the way. 



 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Lautenberg Beats Cancer But Learns Nothing

 | June 27, 2010


Blue Jersey reported late last night that U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg's cancer is officially "in remission." 

Good! We wish the Senator well and pray for continued progress. 

But do you want to know the truth? What I really, truly wanted out of this ordeal was a healthy Frank Lautenberg with a new perspective on the American healthcare system. It may have been too much to hope for, Save Jerseyans. An old leopard can't change its spots even under the gravest circumstances.

I tried anyway, and posed a controversial question to my readers shortly after the original diagnosis back in February of this year: "Would an elderly American like Frank Lautenberg survive cancer for very long under an ObamaCare-dictated system?" This admittedly weighty question unleashed a proportionally seismic response from the various ideological quarters who track such things. For example, our friends at National Review Online embraced my post as presenting a "morbid but fair question," while many New Jersey liberals condemned me as a heartless jerk. It all comes with the Blogger-in-Chief territory, folks.

Thankfully Frank lived, and all we can be sure about today is that the perks associated with Senator Lautenberg's generous congressional healthcare plan -- all owing to the best attributes of the free market -- have afforded the geriatric Senator additional years of work, leisure, and time with family and friends. Frank never once had to grapple with the horrors of rationed care, prolonged waits for vital procedures, the use of less-than-current technologies necessitated by reduced investment in R&D, or the exorbitant base costs typically associated with socialized medicine. He got the best that the "Free World" had to offer and it literally saved his life.

Looking forward, I continue to hope that no other American citizen will ever have to accept substandard health care because of unwanted government intrusion in the doctor's office. But what was once a seemingly simple expectation for the future now appears to be little more than wishful thinking, Save Jerseyans. It's both cruel and ironic that Senator Lautenberg's unwillingness to internalize the obvious lessons from his near-death experience leaves the fate of thousands of other older, poorer, and less-well-situated Americans in serious doubt.


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Embattled NJEA Takes Christie to Court

 | April 29, 2010


What do nasty liberals and union goons do when they can't win an argument on the merits?

Go to court, of course!

That's exactly what the NJEA is up to on this sunny Thursday morning, Save Jerseyans. It's proof positive that they know they're losing. The writing is on the wall. Poll after poll reveals widespread support for the Governor's calls for wages freezes, and almost 60% of local school district budgets failed the voters' smell test last week. Despite millions of special interest dollars spent to DESTROY Governor Christie and his administration's agenda, this Governor STILL continues to hold the upper hand in the all-important public relations battle against the teachers union.

I just wonder how much of the membership's dues the NJEA pays its lawyers in retainer fees? Probably enough to save a few hundred MORE teaching jobs!

And another thing.... the teachers union crowd is full of big ObamaCare supporters. Now the state is compelling them to contribute to their health insurance... and they're suing?!?! HELLO?!?! Hypocrisy much?

From NBC's New York affiliate: 

The latest salvo between the New Jersey Education Association andGovernor Chris Christie comes from the NJEA, with word that it has filed a lawsuit over a new law requiring 1.5% of every public school employee's salary go to pay for state-provided health insurance.

"This legislation was ill-conceived ...and was rushed through the Legislature to meet an artificial timeline imposed on lawmakers by the governor," said NJEA President Barbara Keshishian in a statement.

The Governor's office fired right back, calling the requirement that teachers pay 1.5% a "meager" amount.

"The NJEA is an organization that doesn't know the meaning of the words fair, reasonable or compromise," said Michael Drewniak, the Governor's Press Secretary in a statement replying to the lawsuit.

The union said in its press release that "the new law violates the collective bargaining rights of school employees, illegally reduces salaries for those employees, and violates several clauses of both the New Jersey Constitution and the United States Constitution."



(Above) Senate President Sweeney welcomes 
an NJEA lobbyist to his office.



 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

A "Holt" to the System

 | April 19, 2010


Rush Holt is running scared in NJ-12, Save Jerseyans.

As predicted by your Blogger-in-Chief, the incumbent Democrat is already playing the "class warfare card" in an blast email to supporters. 

Sipprelle campaign spokesman Chris Russell rightly senses fear in Holt's words:


With the respected Cook Political Report indicating the 12th Congressional District race may be one to watch this fall, panicked incumbent Rush Holt wasted little time launching personal negative attacks at businessman Scott Sipprelle in an email sent to supporters that is short on substance and long on attempts to rewrite history, charged Sipprelle for Congress consultant Chris Russell today. 


“Rush Holt has a long, well-documented history of stuffing his campaign coffers with millions upon millions of dollars courtesy of powerful labor unions, political party bosses and radical special interests,” said Russell.  “For him to attack Scott Sipprelle, a successful businessman who is largely funding his own campaign, as a tool of special interests is equal parts desperate and dishonest.  Sadly, it’s exactly what you would expect from an entrenched incumbent who is afraid to debate Scott on the important issues voters care about like how to create jobs and get our economy moving again.” 
 
In the email, Holt assailed politicians who “do the bidding” of powerful interests “and then rely on their fat campaign checks to help them win elections,” despite the fact that is exactly what Holt has done for more than a decade in Congress. 
 
“Rush Holt has raised more than $10 million during his runs for Congress and records show 16 of his top 20 contributors are, you guessed it, powerful interests who Holt does the bidding for in Congress,” said Russell.  “The level of hypocrisy here is pretty stunning, even for a professional politician like Rush Holt.”


Scott Sipprelle and I discussed the Cook ratings change and other related topics in a phone interview released on Friday. Click here to listen if you haven't already. You'll hear a candidate with boundless optimism for his candidacy and his chances of victory in November.

And why should he feel good? Only 12% of New Jersey voters describe themselves as "enthusiastic" about the ObamaCare legislation that Holt enthusiastically supported. Chris Christie also carried the Twelfth District by a solid margin just a few months ago; clearly, the electorate's mood is ripe for an aggressive challenger's campaign to take root and succeed. Holt would have to be incredibly stupid -- or amazing arrogant -- to not take Sipprelle seriously in a year like 2010.

I'm starting to like Scott's chances, too. His campaign's competitiveness is a real jolt to the system for a Democrat Party facing real challenges in what was previously considered "safe" territory. Much bigger fish, in much "bluer" districts, went down in 1994. I predict a similar fate for Rush Holt.






 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

NEW POLL: Only 12% of New Jersey Voters "Enthusiastic" About ObamaCare

 | April 18, 2010


I have more bad polling news for New Jersey Democrats, Save Jerseyans.

Following on the heels of Friday's Rasmussen poll, which reported that 51% of New Jersey voters want ObamaCare repealed, a new Monmouth-Gannett poll released today suggests that discontent with the Democrat package runs deeply throughout the Garden State's electorate. Seriously!

Some of the poll's results were mixed, but three particular findings really stand out as ominous omens for House Democrats. 56% of those polled believe the legislation will have either no impact or a negative impact on the American health care system. 54% expect the bill to increase their personal health care costs over time. Only 12% describe themselves as "enthusiastic" towards the final product.  That last finding is especially amazing for a state with such a large Democrat registration advantage.

Watch out, Rush Holt!

Click here to read the entire results.




 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

NEW POLL: 51% of New Jersey Voters Want ObamaCare Repealed

  | April 16, 2010

Siren.gif - (8K)

A dynamite new poll from the usually reliable Scott Rasmussen:



Fifty-one percent (51%) of voters in New Jersey, a state Barack Obama carried handily in 2008, now favor repeal of the recently-passed national health care bill. That includes 41% who strongly favor repeal.

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of voters in the Garden State finds that 45% oppose repeal of the health care plan, with 38% who strongly oppose it.

Support for repeal is lower in New Jersey than it is nationally. Three weeks after passage of the health care bill, 58% of voters nationwide favor its repeal.

Forty-two percent (42%) of New Jersey voters think the health care plan will be good for the country, while slightly more (47%) predict that its impact will be bad.

But voters also are closely divided over whether New Jersey should join the other states that are sung the federal government to stop the health care plan, challenging the constitutionality of its requirement that all Americans buy or obtain health insurance. Forty-five percent (45%) favor such a lawsuit, while 43% are opposed. Eleven percent (11%) are not sure.

Fifty-one percent (51%) of male voters think the state join sue the government over the plan, compared to just 40% of women.

Most Republicans (72%) and voters not affiliated with either major party (58%) support such a suit. Sixty-eight percent (68%) of Democrats oppose it.

As for repeal of the health care bill, 79% of New Jersey Republicans and 60% of unaffiliateds think it’s a good idea. Seventy percent (70%) of Democrats in the state oppose repeal.

But then 71% of Democrats believe the plan is good for the country. Eighty-one percent (81%) of Republicans and 56% of unaffiliated voters think otherwise.

 


Governor Christie is currently weighing whether to formally engage the battle against ObamaCare. Any delay on his part would likely have more to do with strategy than ideology. In case you haven't noticed, the Governor is in the middle of an all-out public opinion war over his budget proposal! He may be understandably reluctant to "open another front" until his budget is safely through the Legislature.

However, if Rasmussen is right, then openly going after ObamaCare would carry very little political risk for his administration.

You can click here to learn more about the State of New Jersey's options should Trenton decide to act.



 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

My Musical Tribute to Michigan's Bart Stupak

  | April 9, 2010


Your Blogger-in-Chief really wanted to provide a proper send-off for Pro-Life Congressman Bart Stupak (D-MI), the man who pushed ObamaCare over the finish line yet surprised everyone by announcing his retirement earlier today. Curious timing, huh?

But a man's retirement is no time for idle speculation, right? We need to celebrate! 

The following is what I came up with as a tribute, Save Jerseyans. 

Enjoy!






 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

VIDEO: South Jersey ObamaCare Protest at Rob Andrews' Office

  | April 7, 2010


The Republican Party is coming back to life in Southern New Jersey, Save Jerseyans!

Here's video of CD-1 Candidate Dale Glading (R-Barrington) addressing a crowd of 50+ supporters at last week's anti-ObamaCare rally held in the parking lot outside Rep. Rob Andrews' district office. Glading decried ObamaCare as a "sick joke" and encouraged voters to respectfully bring their complaints directly to Andrews' front door. Dozens decided to do so, giving the Congressman's staff an unexpected constituent services workout ahead of Easter weekend.

Andrews played a central role in the legislation's passage, serving as one of Speaker Pelosi's "whips."

Read more about the rally at the Gloucester County Times, and take a comment to watch Dale's address:






DISCLAIMER: Dale Glading is a client of my consulting firm, Exit 3 Strategies.



 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Rambler-in-Chief

  | April 4, 2010


Are you ready for this?

On Friday, President Obama visited a North Carolina factory and was asked a very simple (and short) question: aren't ObamaCare-related tax hikes a bad thing for the overtaxed American economy?

This poor woman's simple question elicited an epic 17-minute, 2,500 word response from the Rambler-in-Chief. In a shockingly disjointed and incoherent manner, he proceeded to address virtually every topic under the sun except for the actual substance of her question. I've seen M. Night Shyamalan movies that made more sense (and that didn't run much longer) than Obama's bizarre performance at this town hall meeting, Save Jerseyans. The audience could barely stay awake! One woman seated directly behind Barack even unleashed a giant yawn about halfway into his "answer." 

So much for Obama's much-celebrated skills as a communicator. And you know what seems particularly funny in the rearview mirror? President Obama chiding a Democrat congressman skeptical of health care reform that "the difference between 1994 and 2010 is me!"

Although, in a strange way, I'm starting to agree with his assessment...

The House GOP snatched 54 seats in '94. Right now, approximately 64 Democrat seats are already considered extremely endangered. Bill Clinton's Gallup poll approval rating in late October '94 was 48%; Barack Obama's Gallup score seven months out? 48%. The point? Obama could still have a lot further to fall -- and much more to lose -- than Bill Clinton could've ever imagined in his worst post-HillaryCare nightmares.

The video documentation:


Part I




Part II




Part III




 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

ObamaCare Rally Tomorrow @ Rob Andrews' Office

  | March 31, 2010


It's going to be absolutely beautiful outside tomorrow, Save Jerseyans.

Here's a worthy outdoor activity to celebrate the end of the flood...

South Jerseyans will rally tomorrow morning at the district offices of Rep. Rob Andrews (D-NJ), a major force behind ObamaCare's passage in the U.S. House of Representatives. Leading the rally will be CD-1 Candidate Dale Glading (R-Barrington). Other guest speakers include Michael Johns, a former speechwriter for H.W. Bush and a popular tea party activist.

Details:


Glading Leads Rally Against ObamaCare

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Rally Begins @ 10AM

515 Grove Street
Haddon Heights, NJ
(in front of Congressman Andrews’ Office)



Contact Randy at 856.304.1101 or email info@glading2010.com

Click here to view the Facebook event page



Want to learn more? Here's some video of Dale at a recent 9/12 group meeting in Gloucester City:





DISCLAIMER: Dale is a client of my new media and campaign consultation firm, Exit 3 Strategies, L.L.C.


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

UPDATE Why is the DNC Already Spending $73,803 on Rush Holt's "Safe" Seat?

  | March 29, 2010


UPDATE - 2:39pm

The Sipprelle for Congress camp reports that the DNC dropped $73,803 on the Holt ad you heard about first right here at Save Jersey:

The DNC has put $73,803 behind a two-week buy airing on Comcast systems in Monmouth, Middlesex and Mercer counties.  The ad is also running for other potentially vulnerable pro-Obamacare Democrats across the country. The spot can be seen by clicking the link below:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEANpi_2vM0&feature=player_embedded

 

“Governor Christie beat then-Governor Corzine in NJ-12 by a 52-42% margin last year, winning 34 of the district’s 44 towns,” said Russell.  “Scott Sipprelle has dominated the Republican Convention nominating process so far and was likely the first Republican challenger in the country to run a television ad criticizing a Democrat incumbent for his healthcare vote.  If the Democrats truly felt Holt was safe, they wouldn’t be spending this kind of money before the calendar even hits April defending Holt’s vote on this awful legislation.”


ORIGINAL POST - 11:09am

If Congressman Rush Holt's House seat is really "safe" as Democrats claim, then why is the DNC running a major television spot for him... in March?

A few reliable sources report seeing the ad posted below on cable television in Mercer County. 

With so many vulnerable Dems fighting for their political lives across the country (and right here in New Jersey), I really can't imagine any motivating factor driving this exceptionally early expenditure other than fear, Save Jerseyans. Maybe the Democrat "powers that be" down in Washington got some bad poll numbers in the district? Its equally curious that they decided to make Holt's involvement in passing deeply-unpopular health care reform the focus of the commercial. Are they that worried about their base? God knows Republicans and unaffiliated voters in NJ-12 won't be swayed by this ad's pro-ObamaCare message!

It's also possible that millionaire GOP Candidate Scott Sipprelle's pledge to run ads "continuously" this fall has Dems second-guessing Holt's previously casual campaign plan. Remember: Chris Christie won this district just a little over four months ago despite being significantly outspent by Jon Corzine. Scott's kitty is a real concern for the bad guys.

Your guess is as good as mine, folks. View this head-scratcher and draw your own conclusions:






 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Bill Pascoe on Romney

Sam Tyler | March 26, 2010


I know a lot of people have varying opinions on Bill Pascoe, I personally think he's a great analyst who has been hurt by running Republican campaigns in mostly unwinnable situations. Whatever you think of his campaign success he is a pretty good analyst of national and state issues. His takedown of Romney, the father of Obamacare, is pretty darn good.

"Mitt Romney had his chance, and he blew it.

He was given the opportunity to establish himself as the Leader of the Republican Party on what has become the defining issue between the nation's two major political parties, and, in the process, solidify his position as the front-running candidate for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination; but rather than showing the intelligence, cunning, and courage necessary to take ownership of the issue, he showed none, and blew it.

All he had to do was say six simple words, words Americans love to hear: "I was wrong. I am sorry."



 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

ENDGAME: Sipprelle Hits Halfacre for Accepting Stimulus Funds in Fair Haven

  | March 25, 2010


*** UPDATE (2:09pm) ***

Halfacre CM Tom Fitzsimmons just issued the following statement to Save Jersey:



"Let me get this straight" said Halfacre for Congress campaign spokesman Tom Fitzsimmons. "This guy [Scott Sipprelle] gave money to five House Democrats last June- three of whom had already voted for the stimulus package when he gave them the money- and he wants to question the cred of a guy who is probably the only Mayor in New Jersey cutting property taxes for the third year in a row? Is he kidding?"
 
Fitzsimmons also pointed out that Governor Christie's budget proposal called for the use of $1 billion in federal stimulus funds. "I anxiously await the next faux-outraged press release attacking the Governor for taking stimulus money and calling on him to return the funds to Washington as a matter of conscience."
 
Fitzsimmons concluded "If the Sipprelle campaign wants to talk contrasts, here are your contrasts: Rush Holt voted for massive tax increases like cap and trade and Obamacare; Scott Sipprelle gave donations only months ago to people who voted for massive tax increases like cap and trade and Obamacare; and Mike Halfacre is probably the only Mayor in New Jersey to cut property taxes three years in a row. Mike Halfacre wins that comparison hands down."


*** ORIGINAL STORY (12:20pm) ***

The Middlesex Convention is just two days away, Save Jerseyans. 

Let the primary bomb throwing begin!

Mayor Mike Halfacre has been an outspoken critic of President Obama's 2009 stimulus package (and rightfully so). That's why his opponent in NJ-12, Scott Sipprelle, now wants to know why Mayor Mike accepted $886,000 in stimulus funds for a Fair haven street beautification project. 

Specifically, Sipprelle is alleging hypocrisy on Mike's part, since Halfacre openly condemned the idea of New Jersey officials receiving any funds in the first place. Spokesman Chris Russell honed in on a guest post authored by Halfacre on MoreMonmouthMusings, in which Mike declared his belief that "…large sums of money in the hands of New Jersey politicians has never proven to instill fiscal responsibility.  And Washington wants to hand over 4 plus billion dollars?  No thank you.”  

The pertinent part of the Sipprelle camp's release:

  


... In fact, the amount Halfacre received courtesy of the stimulus was nearly twice as much as Fair Haven applied for, which prompted Halfacre to proclaim proudly that instead of the original proposal, he could pursue a “dream project” with “bells and whistles” that would include taxpayer-financed brick sidewalks for the upscale community, where the average home sells for nearly $800,000. The news prompted a quick response from Halfacre’s opponent, businessman Scott Sipprelle. 
 
“Let me get this straight,” said Sipprelle, who has steadfastly opposed the stimulus project as a $1 trillion, debt-financed boondoggle that failed to create jobs.  “Mike Halfacre stands up in front of a crowd during an evening campaign stop and rails against the stimulus package, but goes home at night and, as Mayor, applies for stimulus funds for a project he readily admits is bloated overkill?  That’s offensive.”          
 
Sipprelle called on Halfacre to show leadership and return the funds to Washington immediately, and request they be used for deficit reduction.          
 
“This was an opportunity for Mike to show leadership on one of the most pressing issues confronting our country, the inability of Congress to stop deficit spending,” said Sipprelle. “If we are to begin to revitalize the American economy and truly reform our broken political process, we need to elect leaders who have the courage to make the difficult decisions.”          

Personally, I don't blame any mayor for accepting stimulus funds insofar as there are no strings attached (some governors initially balked at taking funds at the state level because of continuing spending requirements attached to it). In this particular case, it's not like the money in question would've been returned to the taxpayers if Halfacre had said "no," so at least this was a way for the residents of Fair Haven to recoup a little of the cash they've flushed down the toilet every April 15th.

Also, in the interest of fairness and accuracy, Mayor Mike never actually condemned local elected officials for accepting the money; his comments were limited to attacking the original legislation as unworthy of passage. Read the whole post here and decide for yourself whether this is an intellectually inconsistent position.

In my view, Sipprelle's point is a fair one. Perhaps doing the "right thing" -- taking a symbolic stand against the stimulus by declining any tangible benefit from it -- doesn't necessarily jive with that which is in Fair Haven's immediate best interest? That's the real question here, and I'd like to hear Mike's perspective on it as a small town elected official.

I do, however, believe that Mayor Halfacre probably did the right thing by taking the money. Example? A growing majority of New Jersey Republicans believe municipal reliance on state aid is an unhealthy practice, but I don't hear anyone blaming town councils for accepting these monies which are essentially derived, in part, from their towns' own contributions to the state revenue stream. Right? It's worth noting that Halfacre did cut spending now that the funds are drying up... a fiscally responsible move on his part. His accepting the funds might've been more morally blameworthy had he used the money to increase spending and leave the town in worse shape when the temporary infusion dissipated. 

Feel free to weigh in on this on, Save Jerseyans. 


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Hypocritical Frank Lautenberg Didn't Learn Anything from Cancer

  |March 25, 2010


Shortly after Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) was diagnosed with cancer in February, your Blogger-in-Chief posed what The National Review felt was a "morbid but fair" question: would an ailing Lautenberg survive long under ObamaCare?

We'll never know, Save Jerseyans. The fact is that Frank didn't have ObamaCare, so despite his advanced age and poor physical condition, the geriatric senator got to choose his own hospital, doctors, and world-class care without government interference or "end of life care" obligations hanging over his head. Frank won't have to suffer with the masses going forward, either! Apparently, House Democrats took the unbelievable step of burying a "carveout" provision in the final version of the ObamaCare legislation, specifically designed to exempt key congressmen and their employees from ObamaCare's reach.

Can you believe the arrogance at play here???

But oh, it gets better! The man who literally owes his life to the previously-private medical industry took to the Senate floor yesterday and demanded that Republicans abandon their opposition to ObamaCare or "forfeit their own government-provided health care."  

Warning: this video really made my head want to explode!






 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Christie Weighing Challenge to ObamaCare Legislation

  | March 25, 2010


Governor Christie told reporters yesterday in Bergen County that he hasn't yet decided whether to bring or join a constitutional claim against the federal government over ObamaCare. Fourteen other states including Pennsylvania and Virginia have already brought suit. Challenging the constitutionality of ObamaCare's personal mandate is one of two options available to states seeking to neuter the bill's full force and effect.

It's not like Chris hasn't been busy!


"I haven’t gotten briefed yet on what we think the ramifications are," he said. "It’s a 2,500-page bill. We would like to act in a way that is informed. And from my perspective, given the transition and that I haven’t been living with this issue for a year, I want to make sure I get fully informed by my attorney general and by my commissioner of health, which I’ve asked for them to give me advice. When they do, then I’ll consider whether or not we need to take any legal action.”

Washington Republicans have said they will use this legislation to win back seats in the 2010 congressional elections. And if they take the majority, they said they would repeal the bill.

Christie said he would let them sort out their options on their own.

“I have enough to do up here," he said. “I have to examine how this health care legislation affects the health care system in the state of New Jersey and whether or not it’s in our state’s best interests, and then I’ll decide whether we need to take any legal steps to try to protect the interests of the people of the state. But in terms of advising our congressional delegation on how to vote on this stuff, that’s up to them.”


Just don't let the Guv's cautious U.S. Attorney instincts scare you, Save Jerseyans! 

I'm confident that our fiscally conservative Governor will engage the health care battle very soon. Remember: he's either been running a statewide campaign focused on state issues or formulating ways to solve New Jersey's severe fiscal crisis for the entire duration of the health care debate. He definitely wasn't lying when he said that "I have enough to do up here" in New Jersey! 

We also know that any deliberative delay certainly isn't ideological in nature. Chris Christie is no "moderate" when it comes to core domestic issues -- just ask the NJEA! Health care is no exception. During the '09 general election, Governor Christie aggressively argued against government-imposed mandates, tort abuse, and expensive health care restrictions akin to the contents of the ObamaCare final package. This Governor believes in private insurance and the free market's ability to provide affordable care unmolested by excessive interference from Trenton or Washington, D.C.

It's only a matter of time until he lends his voice to the growing chorus of national leaders demanding federal restraint and accountability. You can take that to the bank.


ELECTION VIDEO FLASHBACK (7-10-09): Candidate Christie Discusses the Importance of Competition and Consumer Choice to Provide Affordable Private Health Insurance





 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

PROOF: ObamaCare is about CONTROL, Not Health!

  |March 24, 2010


Radio host Paul W. Smith recently asked Rep. John Dingell (D-MI) why the newly-minted "universal" health care law won't begin covering every American until 2014. After all, liberals have lectured us that America is in the middle of an epic health care "crisis" necessitating an immediate, drastic and expensive remedy. If all that's true, then where is the logic in waiting four years for coverage to commence?

The Congressman's answer was very, very revealing, Save Jerseyans:

"Let me remind you this [Americans allegedly dying because of lackof universal health care] has been going on for years. We are bringingit to a halt. The harsh fact of the matter is when you're going to passlegislation that will cover 300 [million] American people in differentways it takes a long time to do the necessary administrative steps thathave to be taken to put the legislation together to control the people."




 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

How Did the 'Sipprelle Five' Vote?

 | March 23, 2010



We've extensively covered Scott Sipprelle's donations to Democrat Congressional candidates, Save Jerseyans.

So how did the 'Sipprelle Five' vote on Sunday?

Allen Boyd Jr., (FL-2) and Baron Hill, (IN-9) voted FOR the ObamaCare package.

Charles Melancon, (LA-3), Heath Shuler, (NC-11) and Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, (SD-1) voted against ObamaCare.

I've called on Scott Sipprelle to explain these donations. It's a legitimate question as we attempt to ascertain exactly what Sipprelle believes regarding some of the most important issues facing our nation. "I tried to change their minds," "we're personal friends," or "I changed my mind since then" are all better answers than nothing. Trust, but verify! Click here to revisit my commentary on the topic and view the relevant FEC info.





 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Halfacre Trumpets Tax Cuts Despite Aid Reduction

 | March 23, 2010


NJ-12 GOP Candidate Mike Halfacre is trumpeting a unique accomplishment on his watch: property tax rate cuts. Under his leadership as mayor, the borough of Fair Haven in Monmouth County is reducing the raw number of cents it claims per dollar from its residents. 

Two excerpts from the Halfacre campaign's release: