Halfacre Slams "Checkbook Primary Candidates"

 | March 12, 2010   


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • Saturday, March 13, 2010 12:02 AM just me wrote:
    You know, after the blatant lies and deceit this week from Halfacre, I really
    don't care what he slams.
    Reply to this
  • Saturday, March 13, 2010 2:51 PM George M. wrote:
    Halfacre has no checkbook, no ethics, no original thoughts...and no hope of representing the 12th in Congress. Real Repulicans will not vote for this guy.
    Reply to this
    1. Saturday, March 13, 2010 3:51 PM Z Man wrote:
      Check these IP addresses, Rooney. I bet all of the Halfacre haters on this blog's comment boards materialize from the same location...
      Reply to this
      1. Saturday, March 13, 2010 4:15 PM Anonymous wrote:
        Z Man: You are truly delusional. Your boy Halfacre is going down.
        Reply to this
        1. Saturday, March 13, 2010 4:24 PM Anonymous to a Point wrote:
          Sipprelle might've won the screening committee if his people spent less time posting on here and more time lobbying county committee people!

          LOL
          Reply to this
          1. Saturday, March 13, 2010 9:32 PM Justice prevails wrote:
            Halfacre did not "win" the screening committee's recommendation now, did he? He missed it by 2 votes. The most telling 2 votes of his 'illustrious' political career. All those years, building to this moment in time, and he could not even meet their threshold! Telling. They know his game.
            Reply to this
      2. Saturday, March 13, 2010 5:27 PM Not really wrote:
        I'd like to disagree with you. There are several of them... Dwight Sipprelle, Travis Linderman, Brian Nelson, Ken Kurson, Alan Moretti, Chris Russell...
        Reply to this
        1. Saturday, March 13, 2010 6:20 PM George M. wrote:
          HaHa!! As much as I have come to dislike your ethically-challenged candidate, I have to admit it is amusing how delusional you Halfacre supporters are, on so many levels If your guy somehow managed to win the primary he'd be toast in the general. So to revisit my original point in another way, do you want a Republican to represent the 12th or don't you?
          Reply to this
          1. Saturday, March 13, 2010 9:37 PM Justice prevails wrote:
            Excellent point! Does Halfacre want a Republican to win....or can it only be himself? A GREAT question!
            Reply to this
      3. Saturday, March 13, 2010 11:04 PM Anonymous wrote:
        Why are the Halfacre sycophants so concerned...practically obsessed... with the identities of those who are posting here? It's what is said that is relevant, not who anyone is ... or isn't. Or are they trying some more sleazy campaign tactics? The Republican Party deserves...and is....better than this. How low.
        Reply to this
  • Sunday, March 14, 2010 11:36 AM Chris F wrote:
    Who said obsessed? More that annoyed at the ubiquitous cowardice of those 4-5 people who copy&paste the same thing on all these blogs, over and over again, day after day. And they don't have the guts to say who they are, they hide like little girls behind an anonymous status. At least they're not touting their glorious online poll victories anymore... which is a shame considering how much time they spend going from computer to computer, using big proxy lists to post 30-40 votes at a time.
    Reply to this
    1. Sunday, March 14, 2010 12:05 PM anonymous again wrote:
      "Little girls"?? What a sexist thing to say! Why am I not surprised that this is coming from Halfacre's camp....
      True colors.
      Reply to this
    2. Sunday, March 14, 2010 3:25 PM SMitchell wrote:
      Are you upset that your blogger-in-chief and multiple Facebook appeals could not win you an online poll?
      Reply to this
  • Tuesday, March 16, 2010 1:12 AM AnaPalmer24 wrote:
    Don't you recognize that it's correct time to get the home loans, which would make you dreams real.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.