Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:13 AM
Mike Halfwit wrote:
Thanks for wasting our time, Matt. Why do you post Art's trash? He's schilling for his drinking buddy. Not worth re-posting on this formerly esteemed blog. Reply to this
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:41 AM
Anonymous wrote:
Totally a waste of time. This filmed propaganda isn't getting the viewership/traffic/commentary your site(s)obtained with simple lively conversation. And Art won't even print civilized criticism of the segments on his blog. I agree with those posting above; Art's blog is now "formerly esteemed" at best. At least you are a bit more open-minded. Reply to this
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:28 AM
Anonymous wrote:
Absolutely true....if the interviewer were not so blatantly biased. It's like.....Keith Olberman interviewing Barack Hussein Obama in it's journalistic value. Reply to this
Thanks for the plug Matt! It's not the rest...there are still 4 more segments to come.
Reply to this
Thanks for wasting our time, Matt. Why do you post Art's trash? He's schilling for his drinking buddy. Not worth re-posting on this formerly esteemed blog.
Reply to this
Totally a waste of time. This filmed propaganda isn't getting the viewership/traffic/commentary your site(s)obtained with simple lively conversation. And Art won't even print civilized criticism of the segments on his blog. I agree with those posting above; Art's blog is now "formerly esteemed" at best. At least you are a bit more open-minded.
Reply to this
Scott Sipprelle's unwillingness to interview shouldn't prevent other candidates from getting air time.
Reply to this
Absolutely true....if the interviewer were not so blatantly biased. It's like.....Keith Olberman interviewing Barack Hussein Obama in it's journalistic value.
Reply to this
Perhaps Scott Sipprelle would agree to an interview with Chuck Schumer.
Reply to this