Underfunded or Overcompensated?

 | February 22, 2010


Go ahead and forward this post to the port authority employee, public school teacher or MVC office worker in your neighborhood, Save Jerseyans.

As I see it, there are two ways to evaluate New Jersey's state pension crisis:


1) The state underfunded pensions, or

2) The state hired too many workers with overly-generous benefits packages.


Plenty of smart people focus solely on the mechanics of the situation. There's a great article from FORTUNE magazine back in May 2009 on the subject (click here). It lays out a financial timeline in narrative form, detailing the budgeting shenanigans and shady investments that eventually led to an insolvent pension system. To summarize, Florio and Whitman reduced state and local contributions to the pension fund throughout the 1990s, before McGreevey and Corzine arrived and invested our tax dollars imprudently throughout the 2000s. I get it.

But isn't the REAL problem here that the state hired too many workers with overly-generous benefits packages?

Governor Christie articulated the problem beautifully during his legislative address earlier this month:


One state retiree, 49 years old, paid, over the course of his entire career, a total of $124,000 towards his retirement pension and health benefits. What will we pay him? $3.3 million in pension payments over his life and nearly $500,000 for health care benefits -- a total of $3.8m on a $120,000 investment. Is that fair?


A retired teacher paid $62,000 towards her pension and nothing, yes nothing, for full family medical, dental and vision coverage over her entire career. What will we pay her? $1.4 million in pension benefits and another $215,000 in health care benefit premiums over her lifetime. Is it “fair” for all of us and our children to have to pay for this excess?


The math just doesn't add up, Save Jerseyans.


So what should Chris Christie do? Continue to borrow money and raise taxes to fund the pensions? That's a financial impossibility -- there's no way to close a $34 billion shortfall. Our credit is shot and New Jersey's residents are already overtaxed and considering relocating to other states. There's no going back.


Governor Christie's only recourse is to completely overhaul the entire system. The proposed changes are fair and necessary. They include placing a $15,000 cap on the remaining sick days employees bank and then cash in at retirement, exclude part-time state employees from the pension system altogether, and mandate a minimum per-employee health plan contribution of 1.5% of their respective salaries. These measures are mild by private sector standards. After all, why should state workers have more perks than the taxpayers who pay their salaries?


As Chris has said time and time again, the pension system was doomed to fail precisely because government wasn't living within its means. Trenton couldn't afford to employ as many people as it did with such ridiculously generous benefits packages. Our situation is not all too unlike the crisis facing the Detroit Auto Industry. In Michigan's largest metro area, massive legacy costs contributed to an unsustainable situation where auto workers bled their companies for $70 per hour. The unions cared more about dental plans than the trickle-down increase in their companies' product prices and the security of their members' jobs. 


The inevitable result in Detroit? Layoffs and plant closures. What makes Trenton so special? 


State government over-promised, Save Jerseyans. Now it's time to pay the piper before we all drown in red ink.



 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • Monday, February 22, 2010 6:43 PM hell_is_like_newark wrote:
    Its not enough:
    1. Eliminate defined benefit plans for all new hires. Defined contribution plans (i.e. 401k) only. At least allow workers to invest into exchange rated and / or mutual funds instead of the crappy variable annuities that public sector workers seem to always get stuck with.
    2. For those still in the system.. raise the age where you can receive benefits. We can't have the state paying people in their 40's and 50's benefits.
    3. Nuclear option. Take the State into bankruptcy and default on the pension system. Reorganize where people cannot receive multiple pensions, drop all health benefits, and make payouts something reasonable.
    Reply to this
  • Monday, February 22, 2010 8:55 PM Pat McNoskin wrote:
    I like the nuclear option. Take the state into bankruptcy. We are way overtaxed. The pols overpromised and the state employees should not have pawned their failure to come to a deal on the future, which is now the present.

    As far as the muni investors they made a bet that NJ taxpayers would basically sell themselves into slavery to pay them -- not gonna happen.
    Reply to this
  • Tuesday, March 09, 2010 12:58 PM Nina wrote:
    Could you please post the exact changes for teachers. Does it apply to retired teachers, active teachers? If you retire next year will the $15,000 cap on sick days apply to you? Thanks
    You have a great blog. Keep up the good work.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.