N.J. Democrats Should Think Twice Before Passing Lame Duck Gay Marriage Bill

Matt Rooney | November 4, 2009



During the 2009 campaign, Jon Corzine frequently proclaimed that "marriage equality" was "on the ballot."

Of course it wasn't (literally). The Governor was referring to the fact that he supported hypothetical gay marriage legislation and Chris Christie opposed it:







Now the New Jersey Family Policy Council is making an unorthodox but not completely baseless argument: that Jon Corzine's poor urban election night performance was exacerbated by his support for left-of-center social positions, including gay marriage.

Do I entirely agree? No. Poor urban turnout has more to do with some institutional factors currently plaguing the N.J. Democrat Party (not to mention a noticeable enthusiasm gap engendered by Jon Corzine's cardboard personality). But gay marriage is certainly a controversial issue that fails to garner much support in America's otherwise "true blue" urban centers, and I do think it's going to persist as a problem for the larger Democrat electoral coalition in future election cycles.

Furthermore, N.J. Democrats should think twice before they ram something down the voters' throats during a lame duck session. Put gay marriage on the ballot! Let's have an honest debate. Trenton shouldn't tell anyone how to live their lives via legislative fiat.

PRESS RELEASE, Trenton -- Governor Jon Corzine, who campaigned in support of gay marriage and named the sponsor of the gay marriage bill as his running mate, lost re-election today in part because of poor performance in traditionally Democratic urban centers. Experts say that the African-American and Hispanic base on which Democrats can usually rely does not support the Democratic position on redefining marriage, which may have made the difference in this election.

"Gov. Corzine said gay marriage was 'on the ballot' with him in New Jersey this year. Today, New Jersey voted 'No' on both of them," said Len Deo, President of the New Jersey Family Policy Council. Values Voters rejected this issue outright! Values always matter and this time they were pivotal in the outcome of this election.

Gov. Corzine linked gay marriage to his candidacy in June at the Gay Pride Rally in Asbury Park (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wj-vhscBGj0). The Governor was outspoken throughout the campaign about redefining marriage to apply to same-sex couples, appearing before Garden State Equality's 2009 Legends Dinner in March, telling a union conference in September that he'd sign a gay marriage bill "this year," and emphatically vowing to support gay marriage in two televised debates. A $225,000 radio ad campaign by the National Organization for Marriage, targeted toward African American voters, highlighted the Governor's advocacy for gay marriage. (http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=omL2KeN0LzH&b=5075189&ct=7569165)

"The Governor did not find a welcoming reception for his marriage definition message in urban New Jersey," said Deo. "Polls show that minority voters oppose changing marriage--even polls done by groups in favor of gay marriage."

An April 23, 2009 Quinnipiac University Poll found that, given the choice between recognizing same-sex couples as "married" or not, 62% of black voters in New Jersey think the relationships should not be called "marriages". Forty-two percent of them even disagree with legally recognizing such relationships as civil unions. (Questions 28-29, www.quinnipiac.edu/x1299.xml?ReleaseID=1289)

Garden State Equality's own poll, conducted in August 2008 and with wording favoring their position, found that 53% of African Americans and 51% of Hispanics in New Jersey oppose same-sex couples "getting the freedom to marry." (http://www.gardenstateequality.org/Zogby%20August%202008%20poll%20demographics.pdf)

Patrick J. Egan, an assistant professor of politics at New York University who has studied black voting patterns on same-sex marriage, said black voters consistently polled much lower than white voters on approval for same-sex marriage, about 16 percentage points. (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/us/politics/21gay.html)

The Governor's continued lobbying for gay marriage appears to have greatly dampened the enthusiasm and turn-out for him today. Polls throughout the campaign showed the Governor underperforming by a large amount among minority voters, including a poll released November 1 by Public Policy Polling, a Democratic firm. That poll showed Corzine receiving the support of only 76% of black voters and just 51% of Hispanic voters. Democrats can usually count on support from those groups of more than 90% and more than 60%, respectively. (http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_NJ_1101513.pdf and 

(http://www.northjersey.com/news/politics/66268552.html)

The Corzine campaign was relying heavily on large turn-out in Newark, Camden, Paterson, and other cities with a majority population of minorities. President Obama even visited New Jersey three times to encourage the urban base to come out, stumping in Newark and Camden on November 1. But in the lead-up to Election day, urban leaders like State Senator Ron Rice and Paterson Councilman Andre Sayegh and Council President Jeffrey Jones publicly voiced concerns about lackluster urban support. (http://www.politickernj.com/max/34665/rice-leads-late-west-ward-mobilization-corzine)

Council President Jones even said, "I think we have our work cut out for us. A lot of people know it's Election Day, and people are starting to talk about it, but most of the people I talk to are pretty reserved about what they're going to do. I can't put my finger on it, because it's not voter apathy. People know what they're going to do. They're just not sharing their position." (http://www.politickernj.com/max/34724/most-paterson-council-members-agree-ground-game-there-corzine-one-has-his-doubts)

"Today New Jerseyans, especially those in urban families, made their position clear. They have said 'No' to Jon Corzine and Loretta Weinberg's attempt to change the social meaning of marriage," noted Rev. Dr. Gloria Harris of Beth El International Church, Newark, NJ, a member of the NJ Clergy Advisory Council. "We have heard from urban leaders across the state about how the Governor's promises of gay marriage led them to stay home or even change their vote," concluded Dr. Harris.

"New Jersey Legislators should take note of this election," stated, Len Deo "New Jersey citizens have no problem with individuals living their lives they way they want, but voters draw the line at the government changing the meaning of marriage for everyone else,” concluded Deo.



 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • Wednesday, November 04, 2009 2:26 PM Door Hinges wrote:
    i agree
    Reply to this
  • Wednesday, November 04, 2009 3:26 PM DavidE wrote:
    There is no telling what Corzine might try to do in a lame duck session.
    Reply to this
  • Wednesday, November 11, 2009 9:59 AM Curt wrote:
    "Let's have an honest debate. Trenton shouldn't tell anyone how to live their lives via legislative fiat."

    Hi Matt, I would love to debate you on this. How is legalizing gay marriage telling you how to your live your life? Its not forcing you to have a gay marriage.
    Reply to this
  • Wednesday, November 11, 2009 4:02 PM Curt wrote:
    I'll start. The problem is that when you put it to a vote, there are still many people like this.

    http://www.khabrein.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=28859&Itemid=57
    TOMMY Do not approve same sex marria 2009-11-08 19:00:15
    I wonder how can people especially the government approve such an immoral acts. g*y marriage should all be executed and slaughter for all I care. It's totally disgust me to even hear about this and luckily there's a Governor that opposes and in my eyes he's the arm of the lord
    Reply to this
    1. Wednesday, November 11, 2009 4:10 PM Matt Rooney wrote:
      So let me see if I can understand you, Curt:

      "Because there are some crazies out there, we should deny all voters the right to weigh-in on a proposed, major social change within our American society?"

      That couldn't possibly be what you meant... right?
      Reply to this
  • Wednesday, November 11, 2009 4:59 PM Curt wrote:
    Hi Matt,

    Being that this major social change doesn't affect the majority of the society, thats exactly what I mean.

    So how is Trenton telling you how to live your life?
    Reply to this
  • Wednesday, November 11, 2009 5:25 PM Curt wrote:
    Matt,

    I also want to address the fact that this is an issue that means a great deal to gay people. For gay people this is more than a major social change, its determining how they are able to live their lives! For a smaller group of people, thats too big of a deal to be put to a vote where it doesn't affect the majority. The win in Maine was a very narrow one, but how much of the narrow win came from people like Tommy?

    Let me ask you a fair question. Are there any gay people who are a part of your life?
    Reply to this
  • Wednesday, April 21, 2010 6:05 PM Lana33Bowers wrote:
    When you are in a not good position and have got no money to get out from that point, you will have to take the personal loans. Because it should help you definitely. I get sba loan every year and feel great because of this.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.