Bad Religion

  September 3, 2009


On July 10, 2009, President Barack Obama hand delivered a letter from Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) to Pope Benedict XVI in Rome. Talk about an extraordinary exchange! What did the letter say?

The Boston Globe offered a partial summary:

"In his letter to the pope, Kennedy acknowledged his own imperfections,cited the importance of faith in his life, listed the ways in which hispublic policy views comported with the social teachings of the church,offered his prayers for the pope and the Catholic Church, and asked forprayers from the pope."

I can't fault a man for seeking spiritual closure in his dying days. Press accounts suggest that the pope responded with the appropriate level of pastoral kindness. But I do have to take issue with a central element of Kennedy's letter:

"...listed the ways in which hispublic policy views comported with the social teachings of the church..."

We've arrived at one of my biggest pet peeves, Save Jerseyans. Ted Kennedy was, or so it seems from the available information, rationalizing his personal moral shortcomings and socially liberal positions by referencing his advocacy of a "social justice" agenda as manifested by the modern welfare state he helped build. The modern Catholic Church certainly opposed the evil of communism throughout the 20th Century, but Catholic thinkers from the pope on down to the classrooms still regrettably believe that government is supposed to play a major role in ensuring the well-being of every citizen. Some even believe that politicians supporting government programs designed to "help the poor" should get a partial pass for pro-choice or anti-family political positions.

Check out an excerpt from Pope Benedict's Jesus of Nazareth for a startling illustration of this warped worldview:

“Confronted with the abuse of economic power,with the cruelty of capitalism that degrades man into merchandise, we have begun to see more clearly the dangers of wealth and we understand in a new way what Jesus intended in warning us about wealth.”

In another chapter on the key Biblical parable, the Good Samaritan, Benedict decries how the wealthy have “plundered” Africa and the Third World both materially and spiritually through colonialism.

It isn't easy for an old altar boy to say, but you're alarmingly mistaken about capitalism, Holy Father. Socialism, and not capitalism, is responsible for "degrading men" to mere chattel. Obviously this is an enormous subject complimented by a full body of literature on the library shelves. For now, I'll limit my comments to two general points:


1.   Economic socialism bastardizes Christ's "Golden Rule." When Jesus told his disciples to love their neighbors as they did themselves, He was, in my opinion, giving us a personal commandment. Although the New Testament repeatedly emphasizes the importance of community, no where does Jesus imply that temporal, earthly governments are in any way primarily responsible for providing social welfare. To the contrary, His famous "render unto Caesar" quote and similar verses reinforce the theory that the call to serve humanity is meant to be an individual charge. Show me the passage where He commanded an entire nation to feed the poor, a king to clothe the naked or a village to care for the sick. You'll be looking for awhile because it just isn't in the text. Jesus told you -- and me -- to do it personally.

That's partly why I get so angry when liberals suggest big government is somehow inherently "Christian." Not at all. In fact, attempts to impute one's Christian duty to a government agency is as clear an abdication of the duty to love as one can possibly commit. It's no mistake that conservatives give much more liberally to charities than liberals themselves.


2. Jesus came to set men free. Liberalism binds men in chains. God didn't make everyone "equal" in the radical sense. When we emerge from the womb, some of us are simply stronger, smarter, or just plain luckier than others. A favorite John Stuart Mill observation was that God didn't pre-allocate resources equally to each of His human creations.

God isn't a redistributer, folks. His specialty is empowering individuals through the dispensation of His grace. He did gave every person a certain equality of spirit; we're all creatures of God created in His image and, therefore, we all possess intrinsic worth. After all, God thought enough of our worth to actually become one of us through the Incarnation. Hence, we're constructed to use the gifts He gave us, whatever they might be, to help each other and make the world a better place than we found it. It's an intensely personal mission imparted to us by a man who led an intensely solitary and selfless existence during his 33-years on earth. Jesus never set up a charity nor did he attempt to overthrow the government. His sacrifice was His own, and what we learned was how to take care of ourselves and each other after He was gone. His life was ultimately an affirmation of human worth and the achievement of

personal empowerment.

On the other hand, social welfare programs rob us of our humanity by making men and women dependent on government. It handicaps the entire Christian dynamic by dehumanizing charity. In a social welfare state, the individual is not as important as the state itself. That's because social democracies or communist states claim to work for "the common good." This phrase is dangerously vague and can be manipulated to mean anything BUT a just society where individuals are free to rise as far or fall as low as their industry and ability can take them. When low income families are relegated to handouts and taxpayers find themselves without the opportunity for advancement or self-actualization, more people will starve than if individuals had been permitted to freely pursue their God-given potential.


Like I admitted up front, this is a truly immense topic with profound implications for our society as a whole. I've shared with you my basic (and brief) thoughts on the matter in order to catalyze a hopefully robust dialog. Please leave comments below.


http://paradoxoff.com/files/2008/05/lenin-mickey-jesus.jpg
"The hero. The leader. The god." from a Moscow museum.


 

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • Thursday, September 03, 2009 8:37 AM Anonymous to a Point wrote:
    1) I agree with you, Matt.

    2) That's a SWEET sculpture. I want it! LOL
    Reply to this
  • Thursday, September 03, 2009 8:39 AM J. Joseph Rivera wrote:
    I personally think that Christopher Hitchens, who is quite easily one of my favorite people, sums it up best when it comes to these issues.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLL7k4K6XCI
    Reply to this
    1. Thursday, September 03, 2009 9:04 AM RINO Alert wrote:
      I'll never understand why Matt Rooney lets an avowed atheist write on his web site....
      Reply to this
      1. Thursday, September 03, 2009 9:17 AM J. Joseph Rivera wrote:
        Perhaps it's because he's an open minded guy who doesn't dismiss people who don't agree with him on every single issue...unlike some people.

        It not like I go out of my way to flaunt my Atheism here either because I respect the fact that I'm in the minority in my party and on this blog. If I am asked to give my opinion however, I give it.

        Plain and simple.
        Reply to this
        1. Thursday, September 03, 2009 9:39 AM Matt Rooney wrote:
          Rino Alert,

          God gave us free will. Dino is exercising his.

          Sure - Dino and I disagree strongly on religious issues. But you know what? Dino supports pro-freedom, pro-personal responsibility, pro-individualism public policies that place him closer to my faith-based worldview than religious hypocrites like Ted Kennedy.

          Don't get angry at Dino. Challenge him! He enjoys it and I do, too. We learn and grow as humans through debate. That's why Christ trolled for men with words - not swords.
          Reply to this
          1. Thursday, September 03, 2009 10:04 AM J. Joseph Rivera wrote:
            You REALLY miss that guy, don't you, Matt? LOL!
            Reply to this
            1. Thursday, September 03, 2009 10:27 AM Matt Rooney wrote:
              Haha. I'm sorry, Joe! Force of habit. I'm adjusting.
              Reply to this
    2. Thursday, September 03, 2009 9:06 AM NJConservativeLion wrote:
      A Chinese proverbs sums up my views: "Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he eats for a lifetime."

      Interesting post, Matt.
      Reply to this
  • Thursday, September 03, 2009 2:07 PM menacing dennis twp wrote:
    the holy father is the lord's representative here on earth and is thusly infallible

    unless he runs astray from the wall street journal editorial page on macroeconomics

    then he's just wrong
    Reply to this
  • Saturday, September 05, 2009 6:10 AM Dan Gallic wrote:
    Matt,

    Your article is a wonderful example of what happens when a person uses their mind, instead of their emotions, to rationally dissect a basic premise of the Roman Catholic Church and compare the premise directly to Christ's teaching and our current paradigm.

    What a wonderful breath of fresh air you are to a world sodden with intellectual neophytes.

    The only challenge I will throw out for discussion, is that sometimes, and I use that sometimes to mean rarely, governments do confront evil and are the appropriate mechanism to do so. For example the defeat of Nazi Germany required a large organization to rise and fight which only a government had the ability to do.

    I believe there are circumstances where capitalism creates an environment that is juxtapose to the social gospel. In these situations government and the rule of law are tools in which we, personally and collectively, use to establish justice. Basic laws against murder, child labor, general working conditions and the existence of unions would fall under this category. It is this same veil in which Kennedy covered himself in a shallow attempt to cover his own personally perverted view of what being a Catholic is.

    By the way, I grew up in Berkeley Heights and my parents were friends of the Kopechne family. If you were to even mention the name Ted Kennedy in our home there was hell to pay... God rest her soul.

    Congrats on a great article.
    Reply to this
  • Saturday, September 05, 2009 5:38 PM Entish wrote:
    Haven't really seen this argument before. I appreciate it as a Catholic who is tired of having European elites look down on the U.S.A. Bravo for publishing this! Let's circulate it.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.