Do You Support Trenton's A.C. Takeover? 
CNN Attacks Sarah Palin
By Matt Rooney | September 2, 2008
Make no mistake about it: the Left is determined to destroy this woman. Why? A Palin victory would repudiate the Left's entire narrative on American life. They need to dismantle Sarah Palin in order to stay relevant.
Make no mistake about it: the Left is determined to destroy this woman. Why? A Palin victory would repudiate the Left's entire narrative on American life. They need to dismantle Sarah Palin in order to stay relevant.
Posted by Matt Rooney at Tuesday, September 02, 2008 9:04 PM 
Categories: Mainstream Media,Sarah Palin
Categories: Mainstream Media,Sarah Palin
The Democrats will stoop to any depth to attack Sarah Palin. They are engraged that McCain chose this woman as a running mate, and now must destroy her with silly things such as her husband 22 years ago had a DUI and her daughter is pregnant. If a Democrat's daughter gets pregnant, what would the parents of the "party of abortion rights" have done? And nobody would be the wiser. Instead, Palin's daughter will have the baby and raise it in a loving home. Obama says publically Palin's family is "Off limits," then sends his attack dogs into the sewer to dredge up innuendo and filth. I deeply hope this won't rub off on Sarah Palin. This woman on CNN, Cambell Brown, is obviously a dedicated Democrat who was becoming almost hysterical when the Republian guest would not answer the question about Sara Palin's foreign policy experience the way she wanted him to. What he tried to say, although he unfortunately did not make it clear enough, was this: Of course Sarah Palin, the republican's VICE-PRESIDENTIAL candidate
does not have heavy foreign policy experience. But McCain DOES. On the other hand, the Democrats have chosen as their PRESIDENTIAL candidate, a man with no experience.
In a fair America, people should be able to see through the medias hype and fawn over Obama and in a fair America, there should be an immediate and definable backlash. We shall see.
Reply to this